Higgs: the man behind the elusive particle
Peter Higgs, the physicist immortalised by the particle bearing his name, was in Amsterdam recently. His landmark publication, predicting the existence of the Higgs-boson, was rejected at first. Apparently, "the editor didn’t understand it at all."
Inside the walls of NIKHEF, the Dutch institute for nuclear research in Amsterdam, a group of renowned Dutch physicists have joined Peter Higgs (80) in the cafeteria. Higgs is in town for the premiere of the Dutch documentary Higgs, into the heart of the imagination. He is munching on a cheese sandwich and sipping orange juice. "No," he says. "That is not how it went."
The question: did the idea that would lead to the discovery of the Higgs-particle just pop into his head in 1964? The same elusive particle thousands of physicists are now chasing after at CERN, the European institute for nuclear research in Geneva? A quest that prompted the construction of the LHC-accelerator, the most powerful particle accelerator on the planet, which cost years and more than six billion euros to build?
No, his ideas formed more gradually. "By the summer of 1964 I knew I was
onto something. That was the reason, perhaps," Higgs says, "That I forgot
the instructions for putting up my tent when we went for a camping trip in
the Scottish mountains."
A fruitful end to a dreary holiday
Of course, it was raining cats and dogs. The couple holed up in a bed and breakfast and returned home earlier then intended. Higgs: "I was pleased to get back." Back at the University of Edinburgh, he wrote the article that would make him world famous. "But I wasn't walking and shouting 'eureka,'" Higgs says, taking another bite out of his sandwich.
Physicists often refer to the Higgs particle as "the pinnacle of the Standard Model." That model describes the smallest particles of which all discernable matter in the universe is composed: stars, planets, people and atoms.
The Higgs particle might explain why so many of those particles have mass, causing them to move slowly and stick together, unlike the wispy photons that shoot through space at the speed of light.
Because Higg's theory is so complicated, metaphors have been invented to describe it. 'Spontaneous broken symmetry,' for instance, has been compared with the asymmetries caused by fibres and veins running through wood. Particles travelling along the lines of the veins experience little or no resistance, while those travelling at a perpendicular angle are slowed down, becoming heavy, like the matter of which stars and people are constructed.
Another metaphor is that of the US president making his entry at a party. When Obama (a very heavy particle) enters the room, the commotion caused by his arrival (the Higgs particle) spreads quickly and draws everybody in his direction. Because of all the people now flocking around him (the Higgs field) Obama is no longer able to move through the room quickly. He is far slower than the relatively unknown Dutch prime minister Jan Peter Balkenende, a much lighter particle in this metaphor.
The question the scientists at CERN are hoping to answer is whether or not the Higgs particle is really at work in the physical world. That is to say, if it actually exists.
It is "somewhat ironic," says Higgs, that his article was first rejected by Physics Letters, a magazine published at the same CERN, in 1964. It was only much later that an office mate in Edinburgh told him "the the editor had not understood it at all." The editor replied he "did not see the relevance of the work to physics" and wrote a polite letter suggesting he send his article to another magazine, like Nuevo Cimento.
Higgs: "It was only later that I discovered that suggestion was not at all meant to be polite, since Nuovo Cimento publishes all articles without peer review." Meaning: regardless of their quality.
Higgs had gone another route by then. He had added a paragraph to the article demonstrating his 'new' mechanism would be able to produce particles with proper mass. "But I was thinking in the wrong direction," Higgs adds. "I thought of hadrons." Hadrons, which respond to the strong nuclear force, one of the four elementary forces in nature, were a hot topic among scientists at the time.
Still, it was that extra paragraph, Higgs suspects, that led to his article being accepted by the American scientific journal Physical Review Letters, and, more importantly, that drew attention.
The shoulders of giants
At a speech given to colleagues last Friday at NIKHEF, Higgs credited the scientists who paved the way for him and who dotted the i's and crossed the t's of his work. He thanked countless people, including a number of Nobel Prize winners. Among the latter were people like Jochiro Nambu, who got the idea for spontaneous broken symmetry from superconductor research into particle physics. Or Phil Anderson, who came close, but never drew the same final conclusions that Higgs did. Or Sheldon Glashow, Abdus Salam and Steven Weinberg, who unified the electromagnetic and weak nuclear forces under the Standard Model. And the Dutch Gerard ‘t Hooft and Martin Veltman, who gave this electroweak force a sturdy theoretical foundation.
It was with the electroweak force that the Higgs mechanism proved particularly useful. This theory covers the interaction between weightless particles (the photons of the electroweak force) and massive particles (like the W- and Z-particles of the weak nuclear force). Only Higgs' mechanism could explain the asymmetrical masses, through the existence of a particle which came to be known as the Higgs particle, or Higgs boson, since a busy congress in 1972.
Over the years, physicists became convinced the Higgs particle might actually be detectable. Indirectly, through precise measurements of the electroweak force at CERN and the Fermi lab in the United States, they established how. Higgs: "And that is when my life as a boson really started."
Isn't it weird to see billions being invested in pursuit of a particle bearing his own name? "If physicists were looking for a different particle they would have constructed an accelerator just as strong and experiments just as complex," Higgs shrugs.
And what if it doesn't exist?
A different question. What if the Higgs particle isn't found? "Then I no longer understand a whole area of physics which was puzzling to me as an undergraduate," Higgs answers, sounding determined this time. "And I thought the one thing we understand rather well now is the electromagnetic interaction and how it relates to electroweak theory."
It could have been different. When Higgs' manuscript arrived at Physical Review Letters on August 31, 1964, the magazine had just published an article by the Belgian physicists Francois Englert and Robert Brout. They had come to the same conclusion through different means. "Because their method was quite complicated they were somewhat uncertain of their results. Perhaps that is why they did not tout the applications it might have in particle physics," Higgs says carefully.
That might be, but the "Englert field" never gained popular recognition, and neither did the Brout boson, even though his name has only five letters, as Brout is said to have remarked somewhat bitterly. And Peter Higgs' elaborate show of respect can now do little to change the fact.